DC Universe     [all categories]
  DC Universe Archives
  The 80- and 100-Page Giants (Page 10)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 15 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The 80- and 100-Page Giants
Osgood Peabody
Member
posted October 23, 2002 03:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Osgood Peabody   Click Here to Email Osgood Peabody        Reply w/Quote
Greene - the DC index site has a complete scan of More Fun Comics #106 up this week, including a very early Superboy story that would be in that first volume if it ever arrives.

I was surprised to see young Clark Kent strutting around without glasses, for one thing, and making seemingly little effort to conceal his dual identity. Also - no Ma and Pa Kent in sight, at least in this story, or much of a supporting cast at all.

It was apparently a long journey to Weisinger's Smallville.

Here's the link, if you'd like to take a peek:
http://dcindexes.com/

Just click the "featured comic" on the main page and it'll take you there.

IP: Logged

Steven Utley
Member
posted October 23, 2002 07:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steven Utley        Reply w/Quote
What most fascinates me about these early Superboy stories is not their brevity or their simplicity relative to later Superboy stories, but their inconspicuousness. The Boy of Steel made his debut sans even a modicum of hoopla, and when he did at last find his way to the cover of MORE FUN COMICS it was in support of the detective twins, Dover and Clover. Moreover, the book still opened with The Green Arrow. One would almost think that Mort Weisinger and the Powers That Were at National did not have a great deal of faith in what they were about.

IP: Logged

Osgood Peabody
Member
posted October 23, 2002 07:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Osgood Peabody   Click Here to Email Osgood Peabody        Reply w/Quote
This is true - and since the superheroes were about to get their eviction notice from More Fun to make more room for the Dover and Clover types, could it have been a lack of conviction for the long underwear features in general, maybe?

I also seem to recall some type of behind-the-scenes dispute between Siegel & Shuster and National regarding Superboy around this time, but I'm fuzzy on the details at the moment.

IP: Logged

DaBubba
Member
posted October 23, 2002 08:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DaBubba   Click Here to Email DaBubba        Reply w/Quote
File under "Wouldn't it be cool if..."

Since DC is still issuing "lost" annuals from the 60's, wouldn't it be cool if they published lost annuals of the 40's? (I know there weren't annuals then, but what if?)

An All-American Annual could feature a couple of GA Green Lantern stories, plus an Atom and Dr. Mid-Nite back-up or two.
The GL stories could serve as a sampler for the archives and the Atom and Dr. M. could test the waters for new series.

A Detective Annual could feature Batman, plus Boy Commandoes, Slam Bradley, and maybe a Robin solo from Star-Spangled. An Action Annual would have Superman along with Zatara, Congo Bill, and Vigilante. I plotz just thinking about it.

Since art restoration is the big cost, these titles would potentially be heavy on material already available in the archives. On the other hand, we'd see some material that might not be archived for years, if ever.

Anyway, just a daydream of mine...

IP: Logged

Steven Utley
Member
posted October 23, 2002 08:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steven Utley        Reply w/Quote
The "lost" 1953 SHAZAM! FAMILY ANNUAL is a step in the right direction. James Friel and I long for a "lost" QUALITY COMICS ANNUAL, and "lost" National and All-American annuals from the 1940s would certainly be welcome, too. This IS the Golden Age of Golden Age reprints.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted October 23, 2002 11:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
I think each of the eight (ten if you count World's Finest and Comic Cavalcade) DC/AA anthology titles from the '40s should have a "lost" Annual.
The dates on each could be timed to take advantage of the best content--thus, Flash Comics and All-American Comics[/i] could have Annuals for 1947 or 1948, More Fun and Adventure for more like 1942 or 1943, etc. Anything that appeared before the cover date would be fair game for reprinting (as would anything from a cover-featured character's solo title, but heavy emphasis would be given to lesser features).

IP: Logged

Osgood Peabody
Member
posted October 24, 2002 09:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Osgood Peabody   Click Here to Email Osgood Peabody        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Steven Utley:
By way of nudging this thread back from the brink of oblivion, I note that 2003 will kick off with a replica of an 80-page SUPERBOY & THE LEGION OF SUPER-HEROES ANNUAL published during the late 1960s.

Here are the contents of said replica (Superboy # 147):

"The Origin of the Legion" re-telling of origin by E. Nelson Bridwell & Pete Costanza

“The Boy With Ultra-Powers” (from SUPERBOY #98)

“The Legion of Super-Traitors” (from ADVENTURE COMICS #293)

“Supergirl’s Three Super-Girl Friends” (from ACTION COMICS #293)

“The Secret of the Seventh Super-Hero” (from ADVENTURE COMICS #290)

“The Legion of Super-Villains” (from SUPERMAN #147)

"The Lore of the Legion" (1 page text feature)


Basically, you get a sampler of Legion Archives volume 1.


IP: Logged

greene
Member
posted October 24, 2002 11:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for greene   Click Here to Email greene        Reply w/Quote
Thanks, Osgood, for the link to the "More Fun" issue. I read it from cover to cover. Quite interesting. The "Superboy" tale was very intriguing, in light of what the series later became. But, to think how "Dover and Clover" merited all those cover appearances...? It seemed a typical 4-page comic filler, and quite minor compared to the substance offered by the Green Arrow, Johnny Quick, and Aquaman tales. Not to mention the Superboy one. Originally, I'd wondered if DC had axed the "Superboy" archive upon discovering how much it deviated from the familiar Superman/Superboy mythos. But, the apparent rarity of these "More Fun" issues seems to be the more often quoted culprit. I certainly hope a Superboy archive will eventually appear.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted October 24, 2002 12:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
If the real problem is indeed the rarity of the issues, then more than ever I hope that DC is scanning the entire issues--even features thought unlikely at this time ever to be archived--whenever they borrow or otherwise acquire comics that aren't in their library. Does anyone know whether this is in fact the case?

IP: Logged

Steven Utley
Member
posted October 27, 2002 11:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steven Utley        Reply w/Quote
To amplify greene's and my remarks above, I cannot perpend these early Superboy stories without thinking that several factors were at work here and, indeed, often in conflict with one another.

First, someone (almost certainly Harry Donenfeld, National's big kahuna) evidently was dissatisfied with MORE FUN COMICS' sales and wanted something new -- a new feature, a new format -- to attract readers. In consequence of that dissatisfaction, someone (probably Mort Weisinger) brainstormed and precipitated what we nowadays call High Concept. At National in the mid-1940s, what could have been Higher Concept than, "The Adventures of SUPERMAN When He Was A Boy"? What would have been more likely to attract readers than a slice off the Cash Cow of Steel? The impetus of this High Concept impelled someone (again, almost certainly Donenfeld) to the response, "Have it ready to go to the printer by Monday!" But then someone -- again, possibly Donenfeld again, or perhaps his lawyers, perhaps on account of ominous rumblings having been discerned emanating from those malcontents who had only created The Cash Cow of Steel (The Man of Steel [Superman]) (Jerry Seigel and Joe Shuster) -- waxed faint of heart and decided that the new feature (Superboy) should be introduced without fanfare into the middle pages of MORE FUN, which was six issues shy of transforming itself into a book of comical comics (a la those hot new cover-featured sensations, Dover and Clover) and packing off its own line-up of adventure heroes (The Green Arrow, Aquaman, Johnny Quick, The Shining Knight) to, well, ADVENTURE COMICS, whose own line of adventure heroes (Sandman, Starman) was about to be sent packing anyway. (As someone, probably not William Shakespeare, wrote, "You're sacked; get packed.") So why use Superboy to attract readers to Dover and Clover in MORE FUN when he (Superboy) was about to go to ADVENTURE (taking with him The Green Arrow, Aquaman, Johnny Quick, The Shining Knight, and presumably readers who were attracted to him and/or them) and leave MORE FUN to readers who had been attracted by Superboy (and/or et al) Dover and Clover if readers had no way of knowing that the book's (MORE FUN) hot new non-cover-featured feature was Superboy, and why leave MORE FUN to them (Dover and Clover) once having gone to the trouble (which of course no one had done until almost the end of Superboy's run in MORE FUN) of using Superboy to attract readers to them (same two as before) in MORE FUN if those readers were then supposed to follow Superboy and Co. (same four as before) over to ADVENTURE, whose sales, evidently so much worse than MORE FUN's, theoretically would have improved had Superboy been used therein (which he was not) to attract readers?

I was going to express this as an equation, but my grasp of mathematics is tenuous, I didn't get any further than High Concept and A Rush Job,

c+h

with c being "concept" and h being "haste," as in what makes waste, and now my head hurts.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted October 27, 2002 07:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
Good scenario; I like it.
Just to pick a meaningless nit: Shining Knight was already in Adventure. Why he, rather than Sandman, Starman, or Hourman was chosen for survival is a mystery.

IP: Logged

Old Dude
Member
posted October 27, 2002 09:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Old Dude   Click Here to Email Old Dude        Reply w/Quote
Mr. Utley;

When this thread bumped up, I started back a couple pages to refresh myself on what was being discussed. I saw the entries about your back surgury, and it occurred to me that I hadn't heard recently how you're doing. The information may be lurking on other threads, but i haven't seen it.

How about a health update?

IP: Logged

Steven Utley
Member
posted October 28, 2002 01:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steven Utley        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by James Friel:
Just to pick a meaningless nit: Shining Knight was already in Adventure. Why he, rather than Sandman, Starman, or Hourman was chosen for survival is a mystery.

James is right. And wasn't it just like Mort Weisinger to dump every feature from ADVENTURE COMICS except the worst to make room for The Green Arrow, Aquaman, and Johnny Quick -- Weisinger creations, all.

Old Dude: the doctor having achieved good results from epidural steroid injections, my submission to surgery, while still inevitable, is no longer imminent. I am on excellent drugs, I feel fine, I can whup any man on this message board.

IP: Logged

Old Dude
Member
posted October 28, 2002 06:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Old Dude   Click Here to Email Old Dude        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Steven Utley:
I can whup any man on this message board.

I doubt that, you gorilla-loving weasel! I'm sure I could still lift a long box of comics anytime I wanted, so be afraid!

Glad to hear you've avoided the knife. best of luck, pal.

IP: Logged

Old Dude
Member
posted October 28, 2002 06:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Old Dude   Click Here to Email Old Dude        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Steven Utley:
I can whup any man on this message board.

I doubt that, you gorilla-loving weasel! I'm sure I could still lift a long box of comics anytime I wanted, so be afraid!

Glad to hear you've avoided the knife. best of luck, pal.

IP: Logged

Old Dude
Member
posted October 28, 2002 06:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Old Dude   Click Here to Email Old Dude        Reply w/Quote
I'll never understand how I can accidently double post the same response, but another time if I want to post again too soon with something I forgot, I get blitzed by "flood control"!

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted October 28, 2002 09:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Old Dude:
I'll never understand how I can accidently double post the same response, but another time if I want to post again too soon with something I forgot, I get blitzed by "flood control"!

There must be something wrong with your computer, because it never happens to me.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted October 28, 2002 09:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by vze2:
There must be something wrong with your computer, because it never happens to me.

There must be something wrong with your computer, because it never happens to me.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted October 28, 2002 10:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Old Dude:
I'll never understand how I can accidently double post the same response, but another time if I want to post again too soon with something I forgot, I get blitzed by "flood control"!

Seriously, you might be double-clicking instead of single-clicking. I've noticed that a lot of old people have trouble double-clicking. Then, they overcompensate by double-clicking really fast ALL THE TIME. I've seen several old people do this even after I tell them not to double-click. Once you are on the web, you shouldn't have to double-click.

Here's why this might be the problem. Sometimes this board is slow. I have a very fast connection, but I waited about a minute for each of my previous messages to be sent. If you double-click fast enough during one of these slow times, the second message might be sent before the DC server realizes that you've sent the first. I'm fairly certain that flood control kicks in when the message is received, not when it is sent. So when the board is responding quickly, DC gets the first message quickly and stops you from sending the second.

Of course, I could be completely wrong.

If double-clicking frustrates you, you can change the speed of your mouse with the Control Panel. However, you probably don't want to do this if you share a computer with someone who isn't frustrated.

IP: Logged

Wayne1776
Member
posted November 05, 2002 09:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wayne1776   Click Here to Email Wayne1776        Reply w/Quote
This week's featured comic book at Mike's Amazing World of DC Comics at http://dcindexes.com/ is Showcase # 10 from Sep./Oct. 1957. It was chosen by this week's "Trivia Contest" winner - me.

This issue features Superman's Girl Friend, Lois Lane. All three 8 page stories have wonderful Wayne Boring/Stan Kaye art, and are written by Otto Binder. (Credits by Mike.)

The stories, in order, are: "The Jilting of Superman," "The Sightless Lois Lane," and the cover-featured story, "The Forbidden Box from Krypton."

As far as I can recall, none of these stories has been reprinted - they were certainly new to me.

Thanks Mike, for a great site, and for letting us read a bit of your vast collection.

Wayne

IP: Logged

Osgood Peabody
Member
posted November 06, 2002 05:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Osgood Peabody   Click Here to Email Osgood Peabody        Reply w/Quote
Wayne - thanks, I've never read those Showcase LL stories, either. I suspect that Weisinger was reluctant to reprint them in the '60s because by then Boring was out of vogue and Schaffenberger was the quintessential LL artist.

It's interesting that even back in '57 we see signs of the painfully convoluted Weisingeresque plotting - like Superman going through those machinations in the Sightless LL story - including building a fake statue, creating a trapdoor for the real statue, and oh yeah, renting a horse - all to create a momentary hallucination for Lois so she'd doubt the veracity of her eyesight!

IP: Logged

Old Dude
Member
posted November 06, 2002 11:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Old Dude   Click Here to Email Old Dude        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Osgood Peabody:
It's interesting that even back in '57 we see signs of the painfully convoluted Weisingeresque plotting - like Superman going through those machinations in the Sightless LL story - including building a fake statue, creating a trapdoor for the real statue, and oh yeah, renting a horse - all to create a momentary hallucination for Lois so she'd doubt the veracity of her eyesight!

Yeah. Superman was always carving gigantic objects — elephants, automobiles, huge barbells, etc. — out of balsa wood and painting them to absolute realism in order to scam somebody that they had super-strength.

And as a kid, I'd have KILLED to have these props to play with .

IP: Logged

Steven Utley
Member
posted November 07, 2002 06:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steven Utley        Reply w/Quote
At Mort Weisinger's direction, at least until young Jim Shooter arrived on the scene, Superman always, ALWAYS, went the long way around, so to speak; so, too, Batman, under Jack Schiff's; if those characters only had invested the time and energy working they put into preserving their secret identities from pesky girl reporters, there wouldn't be a criminal within a thousand miles of Metropolis and Gotham City. Is it any wonder, then, that I defected to FANTASTIC FOUR in 1962? How refreshing it was to see Ben Grimm go straight at a problem with both rocky fists! It was clobberin' time indeed. The Thing's set-to with Prince Namor in FF # 9 is the direct ancestor of every knock-down drag-out superhero slugfest since; page 18 FF # 9 (page 217 in MARVEL MASTERWORKS) is one of my favorite funny-book pages of all time. Catch a Jack Kirby character working a byzantine ruse, hah!

When, during the mid-1960s, Jim Shooter started writing for Weisinger, Superman, finally got to wade into antagonists who could give almost as good as they got: The Parasite, Eterno, the Fantastic Fo-- I mean, the four Element Enemies. After years and years and years (well, it felt like an eternity to me at the time) of foiling Lois Lane's profound obsession with (A) learning Superman's secret identity and (B) becoming Mrs. Superman, of playing the foil to Mr. Myyzxq@&#&*% (I always have to go look up Mxyztplk (okay: Mxyzptlk; you say potato, I say potato), the Man of Steel's relief was almost palpable.

As I have said elsewhere, my most cherished artifact from the Weisinger era is "The Irresistible Lois Lane," in issue # 29 of her eponymous book; it really ought to have been included in SUPERMAN IN THE SIXTIES. Old Dude once provided an excellent summary, of which I wish I had made a copy for future use. You'll just have to take my word for it that, even summarized, the story is magnificently dizzying.

IP: Logged

Steven Utley
Member
posted November 07, 2002 06:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steven Utley        Reply w/Quote
[*sigh* My kingdom for an edit function.

IP: Logged

Dave the Wonder Boy
Member
posted December 30, 2002 03:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dave the Wonder Boy   Click Here to Email Dave the Wonder Boy        Reply w/Quote
The last facsimile "Giant" I saw was the "1953 SHAZAM FAMILY ANNUAL # 1" (which is great, by the way)

Any others in the wings? I never hear of these in advance, I just luck out and find them on the stands sometimes.

IP: Logged


This topic is 15 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | DC Comics

Copyright © 2003 DC Comics
DC COMICS PRIVACY INFORMATION

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47